0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾ÏȯÀÚ °¡Á·¿øÀÇ ºÎ´ã°¨°ú °¡Á·±â´É

Caregiver burden and family functioning of cancer patient

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 12±Ç 3È£ p.384 ~ 395
KMID : 0367020000120030384
¹Ú¿¬È¯ ( Park Yeon-Hwan ) - °­¿ø´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

ÇÑÇýÁø ( Han Hye-Jin ) - °­¿ø´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

This study examined burdens of primary family caregivers, and family functioning of patients with cancer. In addition, the relationship between two concepts was assessed to develop nursing intervention to reduce the burdens of caregiving, and to improve family functioning. Ninety-two primary family care givers of patients with cancer at a general hospital in Seoul participated in this study. The patients with cancer aged from 19 to 84 yearn with a mean alee of 51 nears, and sixty-one percent were male. About 30 percent of the patients suffered liver and billiard tract cancer. Fifty-six percent of the primary family caregivers were spouses of the patients and 70.7 percent were women. Primary family caregivers¡¯ burdens were assessed by the Burden Scale originally developed by Zarit (1980) and Novak & Guest(1989) and modified by Jang (1975) for use in Korea. The instrument consists of six subscales: time-dependent burden, developmental burden. Physical burden, emotional burden, social burden, and financial burden. Family functioning was assessed by the Family APGAR developed by Smilkstein(1978). The results were as follows: 1.The average burden score was 86.1, indicating a moderate level of burden. The time-dependent burden scored highest followed by developmental physical, social, financial, and emotional burdens. The mean score of family APGAR was 9.71; among subjects 82.6% were included in dysfunctional families. 2.Of the characteristics of patients, age, gender, number of admissions, and job were found to be associated with the level of burden. There was no significant difference between patient characteristics and family functioning. Of the characteristics of primary family caregivers, caregiver¡¯s perception of patient prognosis was significantly related to the level of burden, and family functioning. Caregiver¡¯s sex and age were also related to family functioning. The quality of relationship between a patient and a caregiver was significant situational factors affecting the level of burden, and family functioning. In addition, the income of family. and help from other family members were related to the level of burden. Given the results, it is essential to develop nursing intervention to reduce burden and to improve family functioning, such as support groups.
KeyWords
ºÎ´ã°¨ °¡Á·±â´É ¾Ï
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed